Current:Home > FinanceFormat of public comment meetings for Dakota Access oil pipeline upsets opponents -DollarDynamic
Format of public comment meetings for Dakota Access oil pipeline upsets opponents
View
Date:2025-04-17 14:09:05
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — Opponents of the Dakota Access oil pipeline are taking issue with the format of private oral testimony in meetings for public comment on a draft environmental review of the controversial pipeline.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is in the midst of two public comment meetings in Bismarck, North Dakota, the first held Wednesday, the second set for Thursday. People wishing to give testimony may do so orally in a curtained area with a stenographer, or do so in writing at tables.
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has long opposed the pipeline due to the risk of an oil spill contaminating the tribe’s drinking water supply. The four-state pipeline crosses under the Missouri River just upstream of the tribe’s reservation.
The long-awaited draft environmental review, released in September, outlines five options for the pipeline’s fate. Those include denying the easement for the controversial crossing and removing or abandoning a 7,500-foot (2,286-meter) segment, or granting the easement with no changes or with additional safety measures. A fifth option is to reroute the pipeline north of Bismarck, which would require new state, local and federal permits.
Many opponents of the pipeline had hoped Wednesday’s meeting would have allowed them to publicly question the Corps and pipeline developer Energy Transfer, The Bismarck Tribune reported.
Joe Lafferty, a Native American activist who opposes the pipeline, poured oil and water into a cup and challenged Corps officials to take a drink.
“If it means so much to you, I want you, DAPL, Army Corps of Engineers, drink this water with oil in it and then maybe, as a Lakota I’ll consider your request,” Lafferty said. His demonstration did not count as official testimony.
Republican state Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring, who sits on a state panel that regulates oil and gas, said the meeting was a fair process.
“I heard a comment saying, ‘This is no democratic way’ -- why, I think it very much is because you get a chance to say your piece,” he said.
About 150 to 200 people attended Wednesday’s meeting, Corps spokesperson Steve Wolf told The Associated Press. About 80 people gave oral testimony, taken down by two stenographers, which Wolf said enabled the Corps to receive more comments. The Corps received about 50 written comments.
“I understand the fact that some people want to be performative and try to create some kind of a fanfare in front of an audience of people, but that’s not the spirit and intent of the law or the meeting,” Wolf told the AP. The Corps is “absolutely on the right side of the law in how we’re doing this,” he said.
Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Chairwoman Janet Alkire last month called for the draft review to be invalidated, with a new one begun and the pipeline shut down.
A virtual meeting with only tribes is set for Nov. 8. The public comment meetings should be held on the reservation, said Peter Capossela, one of Standing Rock’s attorneys. The Bismarck meetings are more convenient for corporate executives and state officials than for tribal members who live as far as 120 miles (190 kilometers) away, he said.
“If the Army Corps is genuinely interested in hearing the views of tribal members and learning about the potential environmental impacts of an oil spill at the DAPL/Lake Oahe crossing, it would have held public hearings on the reservation that’s going to be polluted by a spill,” Capossela told the AP.
Wolf said the Corps is “being as open and transparent as we can possibly be through all of this, and nobody is being excluded from anything by us.”
State government and oil industry leaders view the pipeline as crucial infrastructure and the safest method for transporting oil, rather than by rail. Officials such as North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and U.S. Sen. John Hoeven have said they prefer the pipeline to continue operating as it has.
The public comment period ends Dec. 13. A final decision whether to grant or deny the easement is expected in late 2024.
veryGood! (67)
Related
- 'Most Whopper
- Pete Davidson charged with reckless driving for March crash in Beverly Hills
- Padma Lakshmi Claps Back to Hater Saying She Has “Fat Arms”
- Mass killers practice at home: How domestic violence and mass shootings are linked
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- The FDA approves the overdose-reversing drug Narcan for over-the-counter sales
- FDA gives 2nd safety nod to cultivated meat, produced without slaughtering animals
- The Politics Of Involuntary Commitment
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- The Politics Of Involuntary Commitment
Ranking
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Maternal deaths in the U.S. spiked in 2021, CDC reports
- Airplane Contrails’ Climate Impact to Triple by 2050, Study Says
- N.Y. Gas Project Abandoned in Victory for Seneca Lake Protesters
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Several injured after Baltimore bus strikes 2 cars, crashes into building, police say
- You asked: Can we catch a new virus from a pet? A cat-loving researcher has an answer
- This Week in Clean Economy: U.S. Electric Carmakers Get the Solyndra Treatment
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Judge Orders Dakota Access Pipeline Review, Citing Environmental Justice
In These U.S. Cities, Heat Waves Will Kill Hundreds More as Temperatures Rise
You asked: Can we catch a new virus from a pet? A cat-loving researcher has an answer
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
In These U.S. Cities, Heat Waves Will Kill Hundreds More as Temperatures Rise
What's closed and what's open on Juneteenth 2023
Q&A: Denis Hayes, Planner of the First Earth Day, Discusses the ‘Virtual’ 50th