Current:Home > FinanceU.S. appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules -DollarDynamic
U.S. appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules
View
Date:2025-04-11 20:36:31
A federal appeals court will allow partial access to the abortion drug mifepristone while a high-profile federal case plays out, but with new limitations on how the drug can be dispensed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit says the drug, used in most medication abortions in the United States, remains approved for use up to seven weeks of pregnancy while the case is being appealed.
Previously, the drug was approved for up to 10 weeks. The ruling also says mifepristone can no longer be sent in the mail at least for now.
The Biden administration says it will appeal the Fifth Circuit's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Late last week, U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk sided with anti-abortion rights groups that sued the Food and Drug Administration over its approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. He issued a ruling that would invalidate the drug's approval beginning this Friday unless the appeals court intervenes.
On Monday, the Department of Justice asked the Fifth Circuit for an emergency stay of Kacsmaryk's decision while the court hears the case. In their request, Justice Department lawyers argued that "the district court upended decades of reliance by blocking FDA's approval of mifepristone and depriving patients of access to this safe and effective treatment, based on the court's own misguided assessment of the drug's safety."
Mifepristone was approved by the FDA in 2000 and is now used in combination with another drug, misoprostol, in nearly all medication abortions in the United States. Mifepristone was initially approved for medication abortion through seven weeks of pregnancy, but in 2016, the FDA expanded that to 10 weeks.
The appeals court's decision means mifepristone will continue to be at least partially available while the case plays out.
It's unclear how the latest decision will interact with a ruling in a separate federal case in Washington state, filed by attorneys general from 17 states and the District of Columbia who are seeking to preserve access to the pills.
In that decision, also issued Friday shortly after Kacsmaryk released his ruling, U.S. District Judge Thomas O. Rice said the FDA was prohibited from "altering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of Mifepristone."
Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, one of the leaders of that effort, told NPR he believes it will preserve access to mifepristone for people in those 17 states and D.C., unless a higher court says otherwise.
The Justice Department also filed a motion Monday asking Rice to clarify the meaning of his ruling, given there appears to be "tension" with Kacsmaryk's nationwide injunction.
On Thursday evening, Rice issued an order affirming that for the 17 states and D.C. — the parties in the case before him — access to mifepristone should remain unchanged, regardless of the Texas judge's injunction and the Fifth Circuit's decision. So these cases remain on a collision course.
A Supreme Court decision could clarify the path forward.
Meanwhile, several states led by Democratic governors have begun stockpiling abortion pills — either mifepristone or another drug, misoprostol. Misoprostol is usually used in combination with mifepristone but can be used alone to induce abortion.
Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee have announced that their states have begun stockpiling mifepristone in the event that access is disrupted. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul say their states are stockpiling tens of thousands of doses of misoprostol.
veryGood! (41569)
Related
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Amtrak service north of NYC disrupted by structural issues with parking garage over tracks
- Fathers away from home fear for family members stuck in Gaza as war rages: I am sick with worry
- Dubai air chiefs summit, sponsored by Israeli firm, avoids discussing strikes as Hamas war rages
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Al Roker says his family protected him from knowing how 'severe' his health issues were
- DOJ argues Alabama can't charge people assisting with out-of-state abortion travel
- Progressive Minnesota US Rep. Ilhan Omar draws prominent primary challenger
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- 3 dead, more than a dozen others injured in large Brooklyn house fire, officials say
Ranking
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Nightengale's Notebook: What happened at MLB GM meetings ... besides everyone getting sick
- SAG-AFTRA President Fran Drescher: AI protection was nearly 'deal breaker' in actors strike
- ‘The Marvels’ melts down at the box office, marking a new low for the MCU
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Who will Texas A&M football hire after Jimbo Fisher? Consider these candidates
- John Bailey, former Academy president and 'Big Chill' cinematographer, dies at 81
- Michael J. Fox talks funding breakthrough research for Parkinson's disease
Recommendation
Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
The Pentagon identifies the 5 US troops killed in a military helicopter crash over the Mediterranean
Dubai air chiefs summit, sponsored by Israeli firm, avoids discussing strikes as Hamas war rages
US conducts airstrikes against Iran-backed groups in Syria, retaliating for attacks on US troops
Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
The son of a Spanish actor pleads not guilty in Thailand to most charges in the killing of a surgeon
Stock market today: Asian shares are mostly lower in quiet trading ahead of Biden-Xi meeting
The APEC summit is happening this week in San Francisco. What is APEC, anyway?