Current:Home > ContactInstagram video blurry? Company heads admits quality is degraded if views are low -DollarDynamic
Instagram video blurry? Company heads admits quality is degraded if views are low
View
Date:2025-04-19 09:26:05
Instagram posts looking a little blurry lately? That may because the company reserves top quality video based on content popularity, the head of Instagram recently admitted.
Adam Mosseri, head of the social media app, revealed in a user-driven “Ask Me Anything” that the quality of the video rendered for a reel or story posted to Instagram can change over time.
Whether the video looks crisp or blurry depends on its reach.
“If something isn’t watched for a long time — because the vast majority of views are in the beginning, we will move to a lower quality video — we will move to a lower quality video,” Mosseri says in the screen-recorded clip. “And then if it's watched again a lot then we will re-render the high quality video.”
The topic has been discussed extensively on Threads in the last few days and has also been reported on by a number of news organizations, including The Verge.
The goal, according to Mosseri, is to “show people the highest quality content that we can" but some worry the tactic prevents content creators with a smaller audience from being able to compete against those more popular than them, and impacts the quality of their content as a result.
Mosseri also explained that a slow internet connection is another instance in which a lower quality video may be shown.
“We’ll serve a lower quality video so that it loads quickly as opposed to giving them a spinner. So, it depends. It’s a pretty dynamic system,” Mosseri said.
Change in quality ‘isn’t huge,’ Instagram head says
Mosseri’s video response was to an Instagram user asking: “Do stories lose quality over time? Mine look blurry in highlights.” The topic migrated over to Threads on Friday, where it was discussed further.
“Now I know why my old videos look like I’m filming with my microwave,” one user wrote.
Mosseri addressed the online forum a day later, writing in a reply that the rendering “works at an aggregate level, not an individual viewer level.”
“We bias to higher quality (more CPU intensive encoding and more expensive storage for bigger files) for creators who drive more views. It’s not a binary threshold, but rather a sliding scale,” according to the post.
Mosseri said the concern was warranted but “doesn’t seem to matter much” in practice, he wrote in a separate post.
“The quality shift isn’t huge and whether or not people interact with videos is way more based on the content of the video than the quality,” Mosseri said. “Quality seems to be much more important to the original creator, who is more likely to delete the video if it looks poor, than to their viewers.”
Users were left unsatisfied with Mosseri’s additional statements, with some writing that the platform’s tactic may actively deter content creators who are just starting out and haven’t built a large enough audience.
“It was demotivating factor, especially when you are specifically VIDEO CREATOR and QUALITY is one of the factors why people will follow you,” another user wrote. “So that’s a pretty real concern for a beginner video creator.”
veryGood! (571)
Related
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Arizona among several teams rising in the latest NCAA men's tournament Bracketology
- Snapchat parent company to lay off 10% of workforce in latest job cuts to hit tech industry
- Fake and graphic images of Taylor Swift started with AI challenge
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Tennessee governor’s budget plan funds more school vouchers, business tax break, new state parks
- Where's my refund? How to track your tax refund through the IRS system
- Executive Producer of Eras Tour, Baz Halpin, is mastermind behind Vegas Show 'Awakening'
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Whoopi Goldberg counters Jay-Z blasting Beyoncé snubs: 32 Grammys 'not a terrible number!'
Ranking
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Connie Schultz's 'Lola and the Troll' fights bullies with a new picture book for children
- Kansas City Chiefs' Travis Kelce at Super Bowl Opening Night: Taylor Swift is 'unbelievable'
- Gypsy Rose Blanchard to Explore Life After Prison Release in New Docuseries
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- U.S. Biathlon orders audit of athlete welfare and safety following AP report on sexual harassment
- Maine must release voter rolls to conservative group, court says
- Why Nevada's holding a GOP caucus and primary for 2024—and why Trump and Haley will both claim victory
Recommendation
Small twin
Whoopi Goldberg counters Jay-Z blasting Beyoncé snubs: 32 Grammys 'not a terrible number!'
Fake and graphic images of Taylor Swift started with AI challenge
NFL doubles down on 'integrity' with Super Bowl at the epicenter of gambling industry
The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
Appeals court weighs whether to let stand Biden’s approval of Willow oil project in Alaska
Everyone hopes the Chiefs-49ers Super Bowl won’t come down to an officiating call
Service has been restored to east Arkansas town that went without water for more than 2 weeks