Current:Home > ContactAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -DollarDynamic
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-28 00:18:24
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (6557)
Related
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- US submarine pulls into Guantanamo Bay a day after Russian warships arrive in Cuba
- Jesse Plemons Addresses Ozempic Rumors Amid Weight Loss Journey
- White House preps ‘dreamers’ celebration while President Biden eyes new benefits for immigrants
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Russia says U.S. journalist Evan Gershkovich to stand trial on espionage charges
- The Eagles are officially coming to the Las Vegas Sphere: Dates and ticket details
- Barkov, Bobrovsky and the Panthers beat the Oilers 4-3 to move within win of Stanley Cup title
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- 'Zionist' scrawled in red paint: Brooklyn Museum director's home vandalized
Ranking
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- The US Supreme Court's ethics are called into question | The Excerpt
- Love Is Blind's Taylor Rue Suffers Pregnancy Loss With Boyfriend Cameron Shelton
- Phoenix police have pattern of violating civil rights and using excessive force, Justice Dept. says
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Ex-US Customs officer convicted of letting drug-filled cars enter from Mexico
- Gamestop’s annual shareholder meeting disrupted after ‘unprecedented demand’ causes tech issue
- How Paul Tremblay mined a lifelong love of scary films to craft new novel 'Horror Movie'
Recommendation
The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
Abortion advocates, opponents agree on one thing about SCOTUS ruling: The fight isn't over
Safety concerns arise over weighted baby sleeping products after commission's warning
Phoenix police discriminate, violate civil rights and use excessive force, Justice Department says
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
Attorney charged in voting machine tampering case announces run for Michigan Supreme Court
Former Illinois men's basketball star Terrence Shannon Jr. found not guilty in rape trial
Powerball winning numbers for June 12: Jackpot rises to $34 million after winner